Every international connection must come out of the sea and onto land somewhere. That doorway is the cable landing station. Once you know where Japan's landing stations are, you can also see why data centers cluster in particular places. For the broader picture, see the complete guide to submarine cables.
Interactive Figures in This Article
- 01海底ケーブルの断面構造(3Dモデル)親指ほどの細さに、光ファイバー・給電の銅・保護の鋼線がどう詰まっているかを立体で確認
Most submarine cables reaching Japan come ashore on the coasts of Chiba and Mie. These spots face the Pacific and offer the shortest route to America. The cables themselves are surprisingly thin — about the width of a thumb — with the optical fibers that carry the traffic packed inside.
Also see: The Structural View (Investor)
Landing stations concentrate in Chiba (Chikura, Maruyama) and Mie (Shima), with east and west legs providing redundancy. Proximity to landing stations delivers low latency and drives data center land value. At the physical layer, deep-sea cables run 17–21mm in diameter and now reach 16-pair, 240Tbps-class density; power feeding and repeaters are the technical barriers on long-haul systems.
What is a cable landing station?
A cable landing station is the facility located where a submarine cable comes out of the sea onto land. The cable that has run across the seabed connects to terrestrial networks here. Landing stations are the gateways of international connectivity — the closer you are to one, the faster and more stable your exchange with the world.
A landing station houses power-feeding equipment that sends electricity into the undersea cable, along with equipment that conditions the signals. These are unassuming seaside buildings, but they are keystone infrastructure for international communications.
Where do cables come ashore in Japan?
Plot Japan's main landing stations on a map and they cluster at a handful of points along the Pacific coast.
日本の海底ケーブル陸揚げ局マップ(局をクリック)
太平洋を渡るケーブルの多くが、千葉(千倉・丸山)と三重(志摩)の2エリアに集中して陸揚げされています。位置は模式的な近似です。
主な陸揚げケーブル:SJC2・FASTER・SJC・Unity ほか
- ケーブル本数
- 約6本
- 設計容量の目安
- 約265Tbps級
- 容量の主役
- SJC2(126Tbps)・FASTER(60Tbps)
房総半島の先端。KDDIの中継所などが集まる、太平洋横断ケーブルの最大級のゲートウェイ。
この地図が示すこと:日本に来る太平洋横断ケーブルは、対米最短距離になる千葉県(千倉・丸山)と三重県(志摩)の2エリアに集中します。容量も丸山・志摩・千倉の3局が突出(いずれも数百Tbps級)。なお表示の容量は各ケーブルの設計容量を合計した目安で、実際の通信量(トラフィック)は公開されていません。
The most important are Chikura and Maruyama in Minamiboso City, Chiba Prefecture, and Shima in Mie Prefecture. These form Japan's two great gateways: Chikura hosts FASTER and SJC2, Maruyama hosts JUPITER (Meta, Amazon, NTT and others) and ADC, and Shima hosts Topaz (Google's cable to Canada) and FASTER, among other major systems. Kitaibaraki in Ibaraki Prefecture was once a main hub for Japan–US cables, but the Japan-US Cable Network was retired in 2023 and the site is now mostly legacy systems (the Ibaraki end of Topaz lands in neighboring Takahagi City). Okinawa serves as a branching point toward destinations across Asia. Ninomiya in Kanagawa Prefecture was a historic landing station but has since been demolished (Submarine Networks).
Why do cables concentrate at Chikura and Shima?
There are two reasons. The first is geography. The Boso and Shima peninsulas offer the shortest way out into the Pacific and a favorable route toward North America. A peninsula jutting into the sea lets a cable reach deep water by the shortest path.
The second is redundancy. Concentrate everything in one place, and an earthquake, tsunami, or cable cut could take the whole system down at once. So the network is split into an eastern leg (Chiba) and a western leg (Mie): if one side is hit, the other keeps traffic flowing. Why proximity to landing stations shapes siting is covered in submarine cables and data center siting, and the full set of siting requirements in Where can you actually build a data center? (in Japanese) (Submarine Networks).
How much capacity reaches each station?
An important caveat first: the actual traffic flowing through each station is not disclosed. The useful proxy is the design capacity of the cables landing at each station — the theoretical maximum throughput, effectively the "thickness" of the pipe. Adding these up gives a sense of each station's scale.
| Station | Cables landing | Approx. design capacity | Largest contributor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shima (Mie) | ~6, more planned | ~440Tbps class | Topaz (240Tbps) |
| Maruyama (Chiba) | ~7 | ~400Tbps class | ADC (160Tbps+) |
| Chikura (Chiba) | ~6 | ~265Tbps class | SJC2 (126Tbps) |
| Chiba Prefecture total (Maruyama + Chikura) | ~13 | ~665Tbps class | ADC, JUPITER, SJC2, others |
| Kitaibaraki (Ibaraki) | 2–3 | A few Tbps class (mostly legacy) | APCN-2, others |
| Okinawa | Mostly regional systems | Regional and legacy | SMW3, ASE branch |
Tbps (terabits per second) measures data volume per second; 1Tbps is enough to stream tens of thousands of high-definition videos simultaneously. As the table shows, capacity is dominated by three stations — Shima, Maruyama, and Chikura — each in the hundreds of Tbps. Shima (about 440Tbps class) is the largest single station, but at the prefecture level, Chiba (Maruyama plus Chikura, about 665Tbps class) is Japan's largest. The recent pattern is that the newest high-capacity cables — Topaz in 2023, ADC in 2024, SJC2 in 2025 — keep converging on these three stations, while the former mainstays of Kitaibaraki and Okinawa now handle mostly legacy or regional traffic (Submarine Networks / TeleGeography).
How thick is a submarine cable?
Surprisingly thin. The deep-sea sections measure just 17–21mm in diameter — about a garden hose, or a human thumb. It is striking that the great arteries of global communications are lines this slender.
Near shore, in shallow water, the situation changes. Damage from anchors and fishing nets is far more likely, so the cable is wrapped in steel-wire armoring, thickening it to a maximum of about 50mm. In other words, the cable changes its thickness to match its environment.
What is inside the cable?
The cross-section of this slim cable is a set of concentric layers, from the inside out:
- Optical fiber bundle: the innermost core and the actual communications medium. Each fiber is about as thin as a human hair, bundled in several to a dozen-plus pairs.
- Steel strength wires: the core that withstands laying tension and deep-sea pressure.
- Copper conductor: the path carrying electricity from shore to the repeaters — a high-voltage DC feed of 3–15kV.
- Polyethylene insulation: a thick resin layer that insulates the high voltage and seals out seawater.
- Armoring (steel wires): the outer wrap used only in shallow water; omitted in the deep sea, where the cable slims down considerably.
Why send electricity at all? Because optical signals fade over long distances, repeaters must be placed roughly every 50–100km to amplify the signal — and the power to run those repeaters travels from shore through the copper conductor. Per-cable capacity is also enormous: recent trunk systems reach levels like 16 fiber pairs carrying 240Tbps (the Topaz example). A line the width of a thumb performs all of these roles at once (Hackaday).
Key takeaways
- Trans-Pacific cables reaching Japan land overwhelmingly in two areas: Chiba (Chikura and Maruyama) and Mie (Shima).
- The reasons are geography — the shortest route to the US — and redundancy: splitting into eastern and western legs so a single disaster cannot take both down.
- Design capacity is dominated by Shima (about 440Tbps class), Maruyama (about 400Tbps class), and Chikura (about 265Tbps class); new cables (Topaz, ADC, SJC2) concentrate there, while actual traffic is not disclosed.
- Deep-sea sections are 17–21mm in diameter (about a thumb's width); armored shallow-water sections reach about 50mm.
- From the inside out: optical fiber, steel wires, copper conductor, insulation, armoring. Shore stations feed 3–15kV to repeaters that amplify the signal every 50–100km.
Article Summary
- Trans-Pacific cables reaching Japan land overwhelmingly in two areas: Chiba (Chikura and Maruyama) and Mie (Shima).
- The reasons are geography — the shortest route to the US — and redundancy: splitting into eastern and western legs so a disaster cannot take both down.
- By design capacity, Shima (about 440Tbps class), Maruyama (about 400Tbps class), and Chikura (about 265Tbps class) dominate, and new cables (Topaz, ADC, SJC2) concentrate there. Actual traffic is not disclosed.
- Deep-sea cable sections are 17–21mm in diameter (about a thumb's width); armored shallow-water sections reach about 50mm.
- From the inside out: optical fibers, steel strength wires, copper conductor, insulation, armoring. Shore stations feed 3–15kV to repeaters that amplify the signal every 50–100km.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q.Where do submarine cables land in Japan?+
Most trans-Pacific cables reaching Japan land in two areas: Chiba Prefecture (Chikura and Maruyama, both in Minamiboso City) and Mie Prefecture (Shima). Other important landing points include Ibaraki Prefecture (Kitaibaraki for the Japan-US Cable Network, and neighboring Takahagi where Topaz lands) and Okinawa. Ninomiya in Kanagawa Prefecture was a historic landing station but has since been demolished.
Q.Why do the cables concentrate in Chikura and Shima?+
The Boso and Shima peninsulas offer the shortest path out into the Pacific and a favorable route toward North America. In addition, putting everything in one place would mean a single disaster or cable cut could take everything down, so the system is split into an eastern (Chiba) and a western (Mie) leg for redundancy. If one side is hit, the other keeps traffic flowing.
Q.How thick is a submarine cable?+
The deep-sea sections are just 17–21mm in diameter — about the thickness of a garden hose or a human thumb. In shallow water near shore, steel-wire armoring is added to protect against anchors and fishing nets, bringing the diameter up to about 50mm. Inside that slim profile, optical fibers, copper for power feeding, and protective steel wires are packed in concentric layers.
Q.Which landing station has the largest capacity?+
By design capacity, three stations stand out: Shima in Mie (roughly 440Tbps class), Maruyama in Chiba (roughly 400Tbps class), and Chikura (roughly 265Tbps class). That is because the newest high-capacity cables — Topaz (240Tbps), ADC (over 160Tbps), and SJC2 (126Tbps) — concentrate at these three stations. Note that actual traffic per station is not disclosed; these figures are the sum of each cable's theoretical maximum design capacity.
Glossary
References & Sources
- 海底ケーブル陸揚局一覧News mediadenwakyoku.jp(電話局データベース) (2024) — Cited for: 日本の主な陸揚げ局(千倉・丸山・志摩・北茨城・沖縄ほか)の所在。二宮局は解体済。座標は局舎/町中心の近似https://denwakyoku.jp/landingstation.html
- FASTER Cable System — Chikura / Shima landingNews mediaSubmarine Networks (2016-06) — Cited for: FASTER(日本=千倉・志摩〜米国オレゴン)。6ファイバーペア・初期設計容量60Tbps。Google/KDDI/China Mobile/China Telecom/Global Transit/SingTelのコンソーシアム、2016年運用開始https://www.submarinenetworks.com/en/systems/trans-pacific/faster
- JUPITER Cable SystemNews mediaSubmarine Networks (2020) — Cited for: JUPITER(日本=丸山・志摩〜米国)。Meta・Amazon・NTT・SoftBank・PLDTのコンソーシアム。設計容量60Tbps級https://www.submarinenetworks.com/en/systems/trans-pacific/jupiter
- Google announces Topaz subsea cable connecting Canada and JapanNews mediaSubmarine Networks / Google (2022-04) — Cited for: Topaz(日本=三重・茨城〜カナダPort Alberni)。16ファイバーペア・240Tbps、アジア初のカナダ直結。Google単独所有、2023年RFShttps://www.submarinenetworks.com/en/systems/trans-pacific/topaz
- 日本陸揚げの主要ケーブル設計容量(FASTER/JUPITER/Topaz/APG/NCP 等)News mediaSubmarine Networks / TeleGeography (2025) — Cited for: 各局の設計容量目安。丸山約400Tbps級(ADC160+/JUPITER60/APG~54/NCP70…)・志摩約440Tbps級(Topaz240/SJC2126/FASTER60…)・千倉約265Tbps級(SJC2126/FASTER60/SJC/Unity)。北茨城・沖縄はレガシー/地域系。実トラフィックは非公開https://www.submarinenetworks.com/en/stations/asia/japan
- ADC(Asia Direct Cable)が運用開始Primary sourceNEC / SoftBank (2024-12-19) — Cited for: ADC(アジア9拠点を結ぶ)設計容量160Tbps超・8ファイバーペア。日本側はSoftBankの丸山に陸揚げ。2024年12月運用開始https://www.nec.com/en/press/202412/global_20241219_02.html
- SEA-Japan Cable 2(SJC2)が運用開始Primary sourceNEC (2025-07-18) — Cited for: SJC2(東アジア〜東南アジア)設計144Tbps・8ペア(7ペア=126Tbpsを点灯)。日本側は千倉(KDDI第2)・志摩に陸揚げ。2025年7月運用開始https://www.nec.com/en/press/202507/global_20250718_03.html
- Subsea Cables — DesignIndustry bodyKIS-ORCA (2024) — Cited for: 海底ケーブルの太さ。深海用は直径17〜21mm(庭ホース/親指ほど)、浅海の鎧装ケーブルは最大約50mm。層=光ファイバ/鋼線(強度部材)/銅導体(給電)/ポリエチレン絶縁/鎧装鋼線https://kis-orca.org/subsea-cables/design/
- Under the Sea: Optical Repeaters for Submarine CablesNews mediaHackaday (2023-08-08) — Cited for: 中継器(リピータ)駆動のため約3,000〜15,000VDCの高電圧直流を両端から給電。リピータ間隔は約50〜80km(資料により50〜100km)https://hackaday.com/2023/08/08/under-the-sea-optical-repeaters-for-submarine-cables/
- Grace Hopper (submarine communications cable)News mediaWikipedia (2024) — Cited for: 近年の幹線はファイバーペア数が増加(Grace Hopperは16ペア)。1本で数十〜数百Tbps級の容量https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grace_Hopper_(submarine_communications_cable)
Share This Article
Read Next
Comments
Sign in with your GitHub account to leave a comment.